Open World Conference of Workers

In Defense of Trade Union Independence & Democratic Rights

 

ILC INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETTER NO. 75

A dossier of weekly information published by the International Liaison Committee of Workers and Peoples
April 20, 2004


**********

To contact us:

ILC International Newsletter
International Liaison Committee of Workers and Peoples
87, rude du Faubourg Saint Denis 75010 Paris, France


PRESENTATION:

The International Campaign "Against the occupation and for labor rights in Iraq" continues full throttle. On June 13 in Geneva, at the initiative of the International Liaison Committee of Workers and Peoples, the 13th meeting for the defense of ILO conventions will take place and will pose the the urgent need that in Iraq ILO conventions 87 and 98 guaranteeing the right of Iraqi workers to organize unions and negotiate be upheld. In this framework, we publish various reports on the situation in Iraq.

The "endless war" decreed by George W. Bush has consequences within the United States that affect American workers: a gigantic wave of layoffs, freezing of wages, reappraisal of the right to health care, to social security, to education, and heinous laws such as the Patriot Act that undermine democratic rights.

Local 10 of the ILWU (International Longshore and Warehouse Union), AFL-CIO, launched an appeal, excerpts of which we publish below, to organize a Million Worker March in Washington around mid-October. Local 10 is the dockworker local based in San Francisco. (See page 3).

We also reproduce the declaration by Louisa Hanoune, Workers' Party candidate for the presidential election in Algeria, following the election on April 8. (See pages 4 and 5).

Finally we publish, among many other articles and reports, excerpts from the appeal launched by the General Union of Workers of Guadeloupe (UGTG) following the sentencing to heavy fines and prison terms of 13 union militants of the UGTG, for a vast international campaign of solidarity against repression to which these militants have been subjected.

Subscribe to the ILC International Newsletter

**********

TABLE OF CONTENTS

p. 1: Presentation
pp. 2, 3: Declarations and Iraqi press clips
- An Appeal by ILWU Local 10 "to organize a Million Worker March" -- United States
pp. 4, 5: Declaration of Louisa Hanoune after the presidential elections
- Press clips from Algeria
p. 6: An Open Letter to the participants of the World Forum on Education in Brazil
p. 7: Tribune Ouvrière, newspaper of the Workers' Party of Burundi
p. 8: Militant unionists of the UGTG Guadeloupe convicted
- Conference for the recognition of the union at the Daewoo-Mexico company
- Subscriptions

**********************


IRAQ

"Against the occupation and for labor rights in Iraq"

Dates of Reference:

June 14, 2003
: on the occasion of a meeting in Geneva an appeal is made "Against the occupation and for labor rights in Iraq" by:
* The International Liaison Committee of Workers and Peoples
* US Labor Against the War (USLAW)
* The International Confederation of Arab Unions (CISA)

June 15, 2003: The 12th meeting for the defense of ILO conventions supports this initiative.

July 2003: The report drafted by USLAW on the American multinationals that have become implanted in Iraq is translated into Arabic and French.

October 3-10, 2003: An independent delegation goes to Iraq in the name of the campaign "Against the occupation and for labor rights in Iraq". It meets with union organizations that are trying to organize and publishes an international report to alert the world's labor movement.

October 24, 25, 26, 2003: The National Labor Assembly for Peace, held in Chicago at the initiative of USLAW, decided to start a campaign so that the U.S. congress hears a report on the violations of union rights in occupied Iraq.

November 17, 2003: An appeal is launched to organize and international delegation to the headquarters of the ILO so that the ILO can organize an investigation into the situation of workers' rights in Iraq.

January 15, 2004: A request for a meeting is addressed to Mr. Juan Somavia, Director General of the International Work Bureau for March 15.

March 15, 2004: The delegation took place at the ILO headquarters and was composed of the representatives of three organizations who are leading this campaign.

June 13, 2004: The 13th meeting for the defense of ILO conventions will take place in Geneva, initiated by the International Liaison Committee of Workers and Peoples.

----------

IRAQ

Excerpts from Information Ouvrières No. 636 (France) April 14, 2004

The entire world's attention is turned on Iraq.

While triggering the infamous Middle East war, Bush believed the moment had arrived when the peoples would accept the boot of American imperialism.

But in their struggle, the peoples of Iraq are affirming that they are part of one and the same nation. In the these last few days, we have been subjected to more misleading reasoning seeking to explain that the only solution for humanity would be to undergo imperialistic exploitation, destroying national frameworks.

We are in the presence of the realization of the fighting unity between Shiites and Sunnis. A step forward has opened toward the national aspirations of the peoples of the entire world, and especially those of the Near and Far East. This in spite of enormous present and future difficulties and the delays that cannot be foreseen.

Press clips:

The International Herald Tribune (United States): "In Iraq, time isn't on our side."

The U.S. press doesn't hide its bewilderment in the aftermath of the press conference convened by Bush in the new situation resulting from the violent popular uprising in Iraq and following the revelations by Condoleeza Rice, National Security Advisor, who was pressured into testifying before the 9/11 Commission.

Let us recall that Ms. Rice is one of Bush's closest advisors, one who is said to have pushed hard for the approval of the Sharon Plan. She been obliged to unveil a confidential report issued one month before the terrible events of September 11 that clearly warned the U.S. government about the preparation of such threats on U.S. soil.

"We will stay the course until the bitter end," is what the U.S. president declared, in substance. This means continuing the war that has resulted in the 600 dead in Falluja, many of whom are women and children -- but at an even greater rate. This is the green light to massacres and "targeted murders" in Palestine; it is the accelerated march towards chaos from which no peoples of the region will emerge unscathed.

"In Iraq, time isn't on our side. We don't need a little more of what has come before. We need something very different and a lot of that something," Said Bob Kerrey, member of the Investigating commission of 9/11 in an article in The Herald Tribune titled "Iraq was a false answer."

"The United States asked for Iranian mediation, according to Teheran," informs The New York Times (United States, April 15). "The Foreign Minister of Iran, Kamel Kharrazi, declared on Wednesday that the United States had asked Iran to mediate to ensure a truce between the U.S. forces and the Shiite radicals in Nadjaf. President Khatani declared: " Iran considers that all policies that would increase the crisis in Iraq and threaten security are as bad for Shiites and for Islam."

The following day the Secretary of the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad was gunned down in the street. "Iran is on the front lines," title of Le Figaro (France April 16), "for having wanted to pose as mediator Š Iran finds itself suddenly on the front lines in Iraq, driven by the logic of violence in the conflict, despite its efforts to remain in the background."

For his part, considering that maintaining the occupation is the only solution, Democratic Party contender John Kerry, is calling for the United Nations to enter into the picture. This is also what Bob Kerrey, the reporter for the Congressional Commission on 9/11 stated: "The United States must swallow their pride and must ask for United Nations assistance in Iraq. Washington should start by sharing authority with the United Nations to help make the decisions on the manner of transfer of power to a legitimate Iraqi government. Before, I was not in agreement with this solution: I am now. Rather than send new U.S. troops to Iraq or prolong the stay of those that are already there, the United States needs an international occupation that consists of Arab and Muslim forces."

The problem, as Le Figaro (April 14) explains at length, is that one cannot see who would want to involve themselves in such a situation?

The families of soldiers in Iraq are showing an increasing anguish, demanding the "return home of the troops." The International Herald Tribune (April 13) worries about what it calls the "Dover test", the name of an Air Force base in the state of Delaware. It is here that the remains of American soldiers killed in Iraq arrive. In the Pentagon jargon, the "Dover test" measures the limits tolerated by U.S. citizens.

The title of the article in The International Herald Tribune reads: "The bodies return backstage." "The number of bodies arrived: on Friday 27 and nine more on Saturday Š on a normal day there are five to seven people working in the Dover morgue. This Easter weekend, there were over 100. ŠThe Secretary of Defense continues to forbid photographs of the victims. This policy, combined with the decision of President Bush not to attend military funerals, has provoked a lot of criticism including from Republican members of Congress such as Senator John McCain.

"The United States has started such a series of crises since Bush took office that the nation is engaged in a very long change of direction where everything that was once accepted is now being questioned and where each hope turns into a question mark," concluded The International Herald Tribune in an editorial on April 15.

----------

Worker Communist Party of Iraq
Statement of April 4, 2004
(excerpts)


Over last few days, an armed fight has erupted in many Iraqi cities between Muqtada al-Sadr's group and the U.S. troops. This conflict has so far claimed the lives of tens of innocent people in the residential slums of Baghdad and the Iraqi southern cities. ...

Our party foresaw the dangerous outcomes of the U.S. war and ongoing occupation of Iraq, and therefore stood firmly against the U.S. policies. Events we are witnessing everyday prove our predictions that Iraq would slip into the swamp of continuous wars, insecurity, and political chaos. ...

The latest events prove that the U.S. project to build a state in Iraq has failed. This failure is the outcome of building the state and government on the basis of sects, ethnicity and recruiting the most reactionary groups antagonistic to the aspirations of people. The project of building a state on this basis in Iraq is only materializing the grim scenario, which will constantly reproduce war and strife.

We repeat the demand of the masses for immediate withdrawal of the U.S. forces from Iraq. We call for transfer of the task of security and stability to a government formed of the representatives of the masses in collaboration with multinational forces, excluding the U.S. and other countries, which participated in the war coalition. This interim government should disarm all militia forces and ensure security, freedom and the requirements of a decent life and also provide suitable situation to enable people to choose their government freely and consciously.

The pain and sorrow of the Iraqi masses grows in the middle of the fire between these two poles of terrorism. We call on the masses eager for freedom and security to rally around this humanist and liberationist alternative, to end the grim scenario and defeat the forces that created it and rebuild the pillars of civic life in Iraq society.

**********


UNITED STATES

Call for a Million Worker March

The "endless war" unleashed by George W. Bush has meant for U.S. workers an unprecedented wave of layoffs (more than 2 million jobs with benefits have been lost over the past three years), wage freezes, and drastic cuts in the budgets for healthcare, education, and social services. At the same time, in the name of the "war on terrorism," basic democratic rights are being jettisoned by a host of new repressive laws such as the USA Patriot Act.

This is the context in which ILWU Local 10 (the dockworker local in San Francisco) has issued a call to organize a Million Worker March in Washington, D.C., in mid-October, on the eve of the U.S. presidential election.

The ILWU Local 10 call states, in part: "Now is the time for organized/unorganized labor, the interfaith and community organizations to show solidarity and demand that all elected officials address the needs of working people. As working class people, we know more than any others the difficulties and limitations we face both in our communities and workplaces. We shall therefore be representing ourselves during this march, independent from all politicians, while putting forward to the entire country, our program for the betterment of America's majority working population."

The ILWU Local 10 call concludes as follows: "While we are in the early stages of planning this action, we are urging organizations to join us in making this march a reality."

In a separate statement, the Million Worker March organizers spell out
"a list of demands on behalf of working people in America."

These include:

- Universal single-care health care from cradle to grave that ends the stranglehold of greedy insurance companies and secures health care as a right of all people in America.

- A national living wage that lifts people permanently out of poverty.

- Guaranteed pensions that sustain a decent life for all working people.

- An end to privatization, contracting out, deregulation and the pitting of workers against each other across national boundaries in a mad race to the bottom.

- For workers' right to organize and for a repeal of Taft Hartley and all anti-labor legislation.

- Repeal of the Patriot Act, Anti-Terrorism Act and all such repressive legislation.

- Slash the military budget and recover the trillions of dollars stolen from our labor to enrich the corporations that profit from war.

- Extend democracy to our economic structure so that all decisions affecting the lives of our citizens are made by working people who produce all value through their labor.

The Organizer newspaper, which presents the views of the militants linked to the International Liaison Committee of Workers and People reprinted the call and texts of the Million Worker March, expressing its unconditional support for this initiative.

The Organizer newspaper also warned that enormous pressures to derail this march into safe channels for the corporations and politicians in their service are bound to bear down on the organizers of this march if this call from ILWU Local 10 begins to galvanize working people across the country. The only way to guard against all the pressures, The Organizer newspaper continues, is to build unity among the working class organizations at all levels and to keep true to the independent, working-class mandate of the Million Worker March.

*******************


ALGERIA

Declaration of Louisa Hanoune, candidate of the Workers Party in Algeria in the presidential elections, on the results of the election of April 8, 2004

On April 8 the presidential elections were held in a climate of anxiety. Were these elections free and democratic?

In the name of the Workers Party I reaffirm that in the absence of a real peace and the resolution of the political problems that face our nation, including the restoration of liberties and the lifting of the state of siege, no vote can express the true will of the people.

Furthermore, this voting took place in a climate of increasing political tension, confusion and uncertainty, having as its background an open political crisis on all fronts. Fundamentally, this vote confirmed that the crisis remains, that the difficulties are always there, and our common fate remains uncertain.

While close to ten and a half million Algerians participated in the election, there were eight million others who abstained, expressing their mistrust with regard to the polls considering that each election since 1992 has never, fundamentally and definitively resolved the crisis, put an end to the bloodshed and stopped the social regression. More precisely it is the Algerian youth, who, by their massive abstention, expressed their immense despair.

And even though a slight progression was registered in Kabyle as far as the turnout, this did not exceed 17% in Tizi-Ouzou, in mourning on the eve of the election, and 15% at Bejaia, as several localities could not exercise their right to free expression. Doesn't this confirm the urgent need for a democratic solution to the problems engendered by the criminal provocation of April 2001?

Certainly on the day of the election, the Algerian people, with its two linguistic components, passed this historic test with responsibility and wisdom, affirming their determination to preserve EL AMANA, avoiding mortal drifts for the country. It is precisely for this major objective that the Workers Party presented my candidacy in the presidential elections in order to help the Algerian people with its two linguistic components to clarify what is at stake, and making a final national-saving effort to preserve what is essential: human lives and the nation.

But the perils persist menacing Algeria as a nation.

Because in my capacity as candidate of the Workers Party, I consider that the official results -- which are very strange, to say the least -- least strange of elections, as well as the various declarations of Algerian and foreign political actors all translate the complexity and gravity of the national situation as the product of the terrible world events that reflect dangerously on our country.

These results indicate that if the worst has been avoided to date, the greatest uncertainties still hover over the present and the future of Algeria.

Thus, beyond the questions raised by the percentages reported in the election and considering that the majority tendency that expressed itself in the election is national, unifying the wilayas that are arabophones and amazighophones, the only message we can perceive at the present time is: the Algerian nation wants to live in the unity and integrity of its two linguistic components, arabophone and amazighphone.

The Algerians that voted, including those who abstained, while showing evidence of great vigilance said: Algeria must not sink into blood and fire. Enough misfortunes! Enough mourning! We want to live in peace and fraternity!

Beyond the nature of the elections and taking into account the conditions under which they were held, through this double national tendency that expressed itself through the voting and abstentions, what is paramount is that the regionalism, tribalism and very specter of dislocation of Algeria -- all of which have been nourished over the past several months -- that were forcefully rejected by the Algerian people in this election. The people showed their deep attachment to the unity and fraternity in one and indivisible RepublicŠ

The people, moreover, rejected of all projects that question the national legislative foundations and material bases that express themselves throughout the national territory by the arabophones and amazighophones populations.

Now more than ever, since the fate of the nation is at stake, it is time to put forward a real solution to crisis, to preserve our country from the storm, in the name of the Workers' Party, I address the elected president so that he will immediately decree peace and that he will convene an Algerian national convention regrouping parties and institutions, including constituted bodies, influential personalities to open a positive solution to the Algerian people, so that all agree to go to work to free Algeria from violence and from all the dead ends. It is necessary to restore the real peace, by bringing to public light all political dossiers that were at the origin of the crisis and that nourished it; that is, the files of the disappeared, of human rights violations, of Tamazights and liberties, so as to guarantee bread and dignity for all. Š

Algeria has 33 billion dollars in foreign exchange reserves, isn't it time now more than ever, to open real perspectives of permanent employment and housing, to ensure a dignified life to the immense majority of people, to the lost youth, through the establishment of planning missions and prerogatives and the control of the Algerian state through public investments?

Isn't it urgent to start a plan of national reconstruction?

It is all about putting an end to all violence the Algerian people are the victims of, in their two linguistic components, and to remove all pretext to foreign pressures, and all established blackmail.

I address the elected president so that the political and social climate can been cleansed by the restoration of the normal conditions of life and the free exercise of politics for all without exception. The right of expression must be returned to the Algerian people so that it can decide for itself the form and content of the institutions that it needs to exercise its full sovereignty. It is also necessary to resolve democratically and nationally the problem of popular representation generated by the serious crisis in which the wilayas of Kabyle remain locked.

For its part the Workers Party considers that the real democracy implies free elections to a Sovereign Constituent Assembly, possessor of all powers, which designates a responsible government, creates a constitution that enshrines control to the people over their destiny and their resources, their rights, liberties, and national sovereignty.

That is why Algeria must live in the unity and integrity of its two linguistic components, arabophone and amazighophoneŠ

I confirm it: beyond the results of the election and its official justifications, which are more than questionable, and beyond the legitimate concern that they cause in relation to multipartyism, the Workers Party considers that it reached its political objectives when it decided to participate in the April 8 elections and in all knowledge and conscience of that fact they would not take place in normal peaceful conditions, of serenity and absolute transparency.

The Workers Party, while awaiting the final count of the massive recruitment recorded to our party since the beginning of the campaign, has just marked a democratic note without precedent in the history of our country insofar as it promoted a wide-ranging national discussion regarding the status of women, including their right to full and complete citizenship. The democratic resolution of this question is now inescapable. The same is true of the recognition of Tamazight as the national and official language -- which our campaign, through its large national rallies, registered fully.

But there is also another indisputable victory -- namely that for the first time in Algeria, in Africa and in a Muslim country, an independent workers' party candidate stood for national office, defending the rights of workers and their children, the small farmers, the civil servants, the youth converted in pariahs, the disinherited and weakened layers, against the devastating policies of the globalization led by the WTO, the World Bank and the IMF and other institutions for the profit of multinationals -- policies which are refracted in the horrors of occupied Iraq and Palestine.

Yes, in this national mobilization campaign that we carried out, the candidate and the militants of the Workers' Party introduced fundamental national questions into the political debate. These questions, both national and international, are directly tied to the terrifying world developments. Our party alerted the Algerian people to the dangers ahead while also establishing that solutions exists, that nothing is inevitable from the moment that it is the very existence of human civilization that is at stake.

Our campaign registered a conscious quest by the people for political clarification and for ways and means to resist. This was expressed in the massive turnout at 169 rallies and conference-debates that we held in the 48 wilayas and that gathered hundreds and thousands of participants.

That is why I declare with pride that the Workers Party emerges strenghtened from these risky elections and more determined than ever to fight tirelessly for the safeguard of the Algerian nation, the Algerian Republic one and indivisible, with its political and social content, by the restoration of real peace and the installation of democracy implying the preservation of all conquests and gains of the Algerian nation, and the preservation of its sovereignty.

Hence, I address all those in the 48 wilayas who, regardless of the official election results held April 8, supported the program on the basis of which the Workers' Party presented my candidacy, to join the ranks of the Workers Party and to reinforce the national independent mobilization in defense of the Algerian nation, in the unity and integrity of its two linguistic components.

Louisa Hanoune
Algeria, April 9, 2004

----------

Press clips

The presidential election in Algeria was held on April 8. Mr. Bouteflika, the current president, was re-elected on the first round with 85% of the votes. His main competitor, the former Prime Minister Benflis, candidate of the powerful National Liberation Front (FLN) who was presented as the only serious adversary and who made it into in the second round, only received 7% of the votes.

Louisa Hanoune, candidate of the Workers' Party, received 118,700 votes (that is, 1.5%). It is necessary to point out that the Workers Party of Algeria has been the object of numerous attacks as indicated in the following press clips.

In Liberation (France, April 8), Ms. Garcon, Algerian "specialist," writes the following remarks: "Louisa Hanoune owed a certain popularity in the peripheries to her radical speech and a relative benevolence of power given that she refused an international inquiry into the deaths during the dirty war."

Let us overlook the elegance with which Ms. Garcon designates the "peripheries" -- that is, the hard-working masses of Algeria. Let us focus on the remark according to which Louisa Hanoune didn't appeal to foreign interference and the intervention of the big powers in Algeria. It would appear from this remark that for Ms. Garcon and for Liberation the "solution" would entail the "internationalization" of the Algerian situation. It is known that Liberation supported foreign intervention from Afghanistan to Iraq, not to mention Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

For Ms. Garcon and Liberation the "solution" is not in Algeria and is not the purview of the Algerian people.

The Workers Party never stopped explaining that the resolution of the crisis had to be found out in Algeria, between Algerians. It has always explained that the examples of Somalia, Iraq and Yugoslavia were actually counter-examples -- not to be followed.

Finally, choosing her words, Ms. Garcon speaks of "benevolence of power" in regard to the Workers Party. Mrs. Garcon is certainly well placed to know about what she writes. The Workers Party, on the other hand, is not looking for "benevolence" or approval from the Algerian authorities, nor from any of the great powers. Its sole interest is to help the Algerian people defend the nation and their hard-won gains.

The Algerian daily L'Expression, which is not close to the Workers Party, summarizes Louisa Hanoune's campaign, under the title of "An ambitious program" in its April 6 edition. The article states, in part:

"In her campaign, she was able to attract big crowds who were more and more interested in her realistic imprint and her message, which responds to the peoples' expectations. From Souk-Ahras, place of her first rally, to Tipaza, where she closed her campaign, the Workers Party candidate proposed clear alternatives to those offered by the ruling powers. Solutions to the multiform crisis that hits the country were thus proposed.

"Faithful to her party line, 'the iron lady' made the recognition of the amazight language, the fight against privatization and the stability of her country her battle cry. Contrary to all the other candidates, Hanoune opposes privatization, notably in the hydrocarbons sector, arguing that it will benefit foreign countries and corporations to the detriment of Algerian workers. The only way to protect the interest of the workers is to relaunch the public sector, she explained time and again.

"She spoke out squarely against the agreements signed with the WTO and the European Union, all of which, she said, open the way to the plunder of the country's resources. She proposed in this context the immediate convening of an Algerian National Convention where all political actors, including constituted bodies, would be called upon to enact emergency measures to lead the country out of its crisis. The officialization of the amazight language is also an essential condition for the stability and unity of the country. She promised in her program to officialize it without passing a referendum, to cut the grass under the feet of those who use this language issue to destabilize Algeria.

*******************


BRAZIL

The open letter we publish here was distributed in Sao Paulo, Brazil between April 1 and 4, 2004 on the occasion of the planning meeting of the World Forum on Education that will take place in Porto Alegre in July.

Considering that the questions raised in this letter are totally current, we decided after having received the signatures of teachers from several countries to republish it. The objective is to pursue the discussion that we consider indispensable on how to defend free and secular public education, at all levels in the face of the destructive offensive that seeks to get rid of it.

Open Letter to the Participants of the World Education Forum in São Paulo, Brazil

Comrades,

As trade unionists and activists involved in education, we call on you to become involved in a dialogue that we believe is necessary.

Between April 1st and 4th a meeting of the World Education Forum will take place under the banner of "Citizen's Education for an Educated City."

It's obvious that we currently live in a world that is facing an offensive to destroy civil rights and peoples' sovereignty. It comes disguised under the slogan of "globalization" and has the aim of preserving the privileges of the big owners of the means of production and pushing humanity toward war. It is a step backwards for society and threatens all the rights achieved by the struggles of the workers and peoples.

Teachers participate in the resistance of the workers and peoples against this destructive offensive.

It is a resistance that recently manifested itself in Spain when, after the barbaric terrorist attack that we all condemn, the workers, the youth and the people as a whole removed Aznar from the government and elected a new government with a clear mandate of bringing back home the troops that are in Iraq and reestablishing the civil and worker rights that were trampled upon by Bush's ally.

Education that is public, free and secular on all levels -- a major social conquest -- is also the target of the destructive offensive. The forms of their planned destruction include cuts in public funding for public education, privatizations, threats to free and obligatory education, and the elimination of diplomas and certificates.

The call by the Organizing Committee of the World Education Forum (WEF) of São Paulo states:

"Educators from the entire world are seeking to unite their efforts in order to build a platform of struggle that defends education as an inalienable social gain that is never subject to cuts due to market conditions. Being guided by the principles and objectives of the World Social Forum, the World Education Form constitutes itself as a great movement around a common cause: another type of education is possible."

We ask if there is a way of understanding education as "an inalienable social gain that is never subject to cuts due to market conditions" other than that of the struggle for the unquestionable right to free and public education?

For us, and we believe for every educator that is committed to democracy and social progress, evidently the answer is no.

The first question that is posed, therefore, is why, in the appeal of the WEF of São Paulo, that speaks of a "project of global education" and that "another education is possible", there is no explicit mention of the defense of public education?

We all know that the multinational corporations consider education as a billion-dollar market that even today escapes from its total control. Precisely because of this the most steadfast opposition is necessary to the privatization of public education and to its breakup, whatever the form may be: private schools; vouchers for public schools; the association of the public universities as private businesses; as NGOs; public funds for private educational institutions, etc.

Why then is there this omission? In the very appeal we can read what seems to indicate a reason:
"The framework of this forum is that of the efforts to guarantee the civil rights of all people, by means of emancipatory programs in the various formal, semi-formal and informal schools with the objective of education for the citizens in the construction of an "Educational City."

What does this mean?

The words have a certain meaning, and here we revert back to the language of the World Bank, the WTO, the OECD and all the governments that apply the policy of the destruction of public education -- that is, promoting "various formal, semi-formal and informal schools."

For example, in the report of the OECD about education in 1998 it is said, "[I]t is understood that learning takes place in multiple contexts, both formal and informal." The report goes on to state that "globalization -- economic, political and cultural -- makes obsolete the institution that is implanted locally and rooted in a specific culture that we call a 'school' and along with that a "teacher'."

If the "formal" spaces include private education (where obviously education is a commodity), the "not formal and informal" spaces, by definition, are outside of any public regulation and scrutiny, with the goal of destroying public education as an institution. In that way, capitalist enterprises, churches, and NG's are called upon to be players in the informal educational endeavors, relieving the government from its duty to guarantee public, secular and free education at all levels.

As for the "informal" schools, what is to be understood by that other than proposals for "schools during a whole lifetime" -- which is discussed in the WTO with the enthusiastic support of the capitalists? In such a concept individuals would be subordinated to the needs of businesses and the stage would be set for the "flexibility" of their rights. It is a policy that questions the right to public education and favors child labor. It is a policy that questions the universal right to a formal public education, which guarantees diplomas and training that make the labor force more valuable.

For Public and Free Education. Public Funds only for Public Schools.

Among the 60,000 participants that the organizers are expecting at the São Paulo meeting which is preparing for the Third World Forum on Education in Porto Alegre next July, there will be trade unionists and professionals that stand together in the defense of the workers and their right to education that is public, secular and free at all levels.

We direct ourselves to our fellow activists to alert you to the danger that exists in this so-called type of "Forum" which bases itself upon the "principles and goals of the World Social Forum."

While class distinctions are blurred or even eliminated in the so-called "civil society" -- a concept that includes everyone from the large multinational companies, the private foundations, the World Bank, governments, NGOs, to even the unions of the educational workers -- the "principles and goals" of the World Social Forum can be summed up in the slogan "to give a human face to globalization"! We should not try to humanize capitalism, fellow educators, but rather struggle against it.

And today the struggle is to defend what we have fought for and won against a destructive fury never seen before. This includes the defense of formal, public and free education, with the public funds necessary to compensate professional educators and attend to the right of every citizen to a quality education.

The policy of the "civil society" and the "Citizen's Education", which omits the defense of public schools, creates the fertile ground for the spreading of the ideas and the proposals of the "emancipatory programs in the various formal, semi-formal and informal schools."

From there everything is possible. Public schools can be "emancipated." A course to recycle labor that is offered by businesses can also take place. Unions, for example, instead of concentrating their energies on the demand for free public education and public funds only for public schools, are invited to become involved in their "projects" of "emancipatory education."

Next July, there will also take place in Porto Alegre the Fourth Convention of Education International (EI), an organization with unions from all continents with the theme "Education for Global Progress." Evidently the questions raised in this open letter will be present in this meeting.

For this reason, fellow activists, we send these thoughts to you and we believe that the unity of the educational workers and their unions is more necessary than ever. We say:

- No to the Privatization and Deregulation of Education

- Defend Public and Free Education as an "Obligation of Government and Right of the Citizen"

- Public Funds only for Public Schools!

- Money for Schools and Public Services, Not for War and the Payment of the Foreign Debt!


São Paulo, March 26, 2004

[Follows a list with 45 signatories]

********************


BURUNDI

Tribune Ouvrière, the newspaper that fights for the constitution of a workers' party (No. 43, February 2004)

EDITORIAL:

The primary teachers joined the secondary teachers' strike in unity with their unions to demand the application of agreements concluded with the government in 2002. The strike has lasted two months.

Over one hundred farmers of Gatakwa (Rumonge Township) did a sit-in lasting over a week before the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock demanding the lands confiscated from them be returned.

The magistrates with their union the SYMABU threaten to take up the strike movement again if the government doesn't fulfill the agreements concluded with the union.

The population of this country knows some conditions where survival is seriously questioned under the effects of the policies of privatization and the repayment of the foreign debt.

However in spite of the 'discussions' in Amsterdam on January 18-21, 204 between President Ndayizeye and the Palipehutu-Fnl, the former never suspended the attacks and confrontation with the regular army which increased especially in rural Bujumbura, causing the death of civilians and the 'displacement' of several thousand people.

The Palipehutu-Fnl declared on February 13, 2004 that it decided to break off talks with President Ndayizeye and to 'restart' the war since he had not respected the agreements reached in Amsterdam while intensifying the attacks against the troops of the Palipehutu-Fnl.

Under these conditions one must ask these questions:

* Why is the criminality intensifying with populations being massacred, assassinations, plundering, rape of women, etc.

* What is the sense of the ultimatum given by the summit of heads of state of the region on 16/11/03 ENJOINING THE Palipehutu-Fnl to 'stop' the attacks and that expired on 16/02/2004?

* Why the 'general states' of the Frodebu (February 14-15, 2004) joined the teachers' unions? In the name of what democracy do the workers and their union organizations need to sell their independence while attaching themselves to a political party?

The elections and the institutions that we speak of and the parties and institutional movements will result in peace if the workers, the youth and the workers debate sovereingly about their deep aspirations, the institutions to be established and their content.

- The Editor

-----

The cycle of strikes against privatization

The Sugar cane society of the Moso (SOSUMO), one of the public corporations that this country has, supplies the population with sugar and the surplus that is exported to the countries of the sub-region. This enterprise is particularly prosperous and draws the appetites of privatizers on the orders of international financial institutions for which the public sector, meaning the nation itself, must disappear. With the means at hand and in difficult conditions the workers of the company fight tooth and nail for the defense of their working conditions and of the SOSUMO itself as a public enterprise. The defense of public service is the defense of the sovereignty of the country.

The 2003 harvest that started on July 3, 2003 ended on November 24, 2003 with a production of more than 20,000 tons of sugar against 17.600 tons in 2002 and 18,177 tons in 2001.

The 2003 harvest was marked by a cycle of strikes.

From July 19 to 20, two weeks after the beginning of the harvest, the cane cutters stopped work to insist the management of the company raise their daily pay that wasn't over 550 FBU. But their movement failed. At the same time, relations between management and the other workers deteriorated because of the worsening of work conditions. This situation was the origin of an important strike movement started in October 20 to 22, 2003 during the harvest, around the following demands:

1. The resignation of the general manager.
2. An increase in wages.
3. The revision of the statute governing the personnel since the one that is in forced is constantly violated.
4. The generalization to all the workers of the harvest bonus at present only received by management.
5. The granting of lots and the access to credit for the first home etc.

Let us recall that these demands are added to the others posed since 2000.

In his letter SG/02/02/2000 No, the head of the union of workers of the SYTIS sugar cane industry had asked for the organization of the formation of administrators and agents of the SOSUMO, denouncing the poor conditions of lodging of the SOSUMO agents in categories 1, 11 and 111, the precarious health care, the considerable gaps between the different categories of workers with regard to business expenses, the poor recruitment where families are left by dead workers, the process of privatization, etc.

Since then, union representation dove into total silence due to the undisclosed interests and the situation has worsened to the detriment of the workers. The new team heading up SYTIS at the time of the recent elections hasŠpain sur la plancheŠbecause it finds itself under an obligation to channel all these aspirations to safeguard the interests of the workers and the enterprise, starting with working people.

- Antoine Manuma

*******************


GUADELOUPE

13 union militants of the UGTG receive heavy sentences

Repetitious processes have taken place in Guadeloupe against the members of the General Union of Workers of Guadeloupe (UGTG), whose headquarters issued a communiqué on the sentences pronounced and made public on April 1:

"The governments of France follow themselves and look alike when it's about anti-union repression. The Chirac-Raffarin-Sarkozy government undertook a ferocious police and judicial repression, resulting in penal sentences against the workers and union representatives of the UGTG. Jail terms of 27 months, 75 months of suspended sentences, 120 159,50 euros fine or 787 044 F, were applied against 13 militants and leaders of the UGTG union.

Following is a list of the 13 militants convicted among whom are:

Guy Suzanon, member of the legal council of the UGTG union, Head of the UTC-UGTG (Union of Workers of the Collectives), sentenced to four months in jail with suspension and 6 000 euros fine for being present on a barricade on the occasion of a strike of the local workers.

Francois Montantin, personnel delegate of ECOMAX, (graduate) sentenced to six months in jail with suspension and 5 607 euros fine, according to the testimony of a shop steward who recognized him among the strikers that occupied an ECOMAX store.

Michel Madassamy, member of the council of the UGTG and the UTPP (Union of petroleum workers), sentenced to 10 months jai, and 53 000 euros for damages and interest accused without proof of having broken the windshield of a truck belonging to TEXACO that also dismissed three drivers for going on strikeŠ

The UGTG affirms that French justice in Guadeloupe will not annihilate the natural right to resistance to oppression the fighters for liberty have lived through, men and women of the slavery period, that makes the workers of Guadeloupe their worthy heirsŠ

The UGTG calls on all its adherents, along with the workers, the people of Guadeloupe, the organizations beholden to justice, to international opinion, to gather in various ways a vast solidarity against the anti-union repression that victimize the unionists of Guadeloupe.

*******************


MEXICO

Campaign in Defense of the Daewoo
Maquiladora Workers in Mexicali, Mexico

Support the April 24 International Conference in
Mexicali in Defense of the Daewoo Workers!

In Mexicali, last October, about 40 workers at the Daewoo Orion de Mexico (DOMEX) company organized themselves to form a union. They submitted their union registration application to the National Reconciliation Board. Soon after, Daewoo management began to harass the workers who had signed onto the union, taking away bonus points for punctuality, productivity, attendance and loyalty -- which was tantamount to a wage cut of 200 pesos per month, a considerable sum considering their incredibly low wages. When some of the workers protested this abuse, they were fired.

The five fired workers who took the lead in organizing a genuine union at Daewoo are Juan Carlos Espinoza Bravo (interim general secretary), Victor Ortega (interim organizing director), Rita Soltero (interim recording secretary), and Rogelio Torres and Alan Lechuga Moreno of the interim executive board.

The Daewoo maquiladora factory produces TV screens for the U.S. market. It is owned by a Korean multinational corporation. It employs more than 800 workers. For the past four years, workers have received no wage increases, even though management got numerous raises. The rate of job injuries has increased dramatically during this period due to speed-up.

Meanwhile the Reconciliation Board has ignored the Daewoo workers' petition to form a union, even though formally they must announce their decision to certify a new union 60 days after the application is filed.

The Daewoo workers, together with workers in other maquiladora plants in the Mexicali region, have launched a new organization -- the Movement for Freedom and Labor Rights for Workers in the Maquiladora Industry (MOLDELTIM) -- and are calling on the trade union movement in the United States and across the Americas to support their struggle for independent unions and labor rights. They insist that workers in the maquiladoras must be granted at least the same labor rights as all workers throughout Mexico.

At the Western Hemisphere Workers Conference Against the FTAA held in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on December 12-13, the Mexican delegation brought a proposal to the conference to constitute an International Commission of Inquiry that would travel to Mexicali to investigate the living, working and union conditions of the maquiladora workers at the Daewoo and other plants.

The Open World Conference Continuations Committee supports this effort and, in coordination with the MOLDETIM organizers, is calling on labor officials, unionists and activists in the United States, Mexico and Canada to participate in a one-day conference in Mexicali on Saturday, April 24, to listen to the testimonies of the fired Daewoo workers and other workers in the maquiladora industry, and to promote a wider solidarity campaign on their behalf, including a much-needed financial campaign, as the fired workers have been blacklisted and no maquiladora will give them work.

Please fill out the coupon below if you are interested in participating in this Conference in Support of the Maquiladora Workers in Mexicali on April 24th. Also, we ask all supporters of labor rights, whether you are able to come to Mexicali or not, to please send statements to Daewoo management and to the authorities in the state of Baja California protesting the repression and demanding the immediate reinstatement in their jobs of the five fired workers.

Thanks, in advance, for your support,

Eddie Rosario and Alan Benjamin,
Co-coordinators,
OWC Continuations Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to Home                       Back to ILC Newsletter Index